<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Samsung M8910 Pixon12 Cameraphone Is Better than Canon 350D (Digital Rebel XT)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/</link>
	<description>A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AndrewG NY</title>
		<link>http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewG NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/?p=3185#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Sadly, p&amp;s sensors are shrinking to the size of mobile phone sensors.  According their &quot;test&quot;, the A620 is also a better choice than a 350D, probably the best of the &quot;test&quot; group.  Who needs resolution when you can just dial up the sharpening, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, p&amp;s sensors are shrinking to the size of mobile phone sensors.  According their &#8220;test&#8221;, the A620 is also a better choice than a 350D, probably the best of the &#8220;test&#8221; group.  Who needs resolution when you can just dial up the sharpening, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/?p=3185#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>BTW, here&#039;s a geeky tech link with details of some of Sony&#039;s recent sensors for mobiles:

http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200811/08-144E/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, here&#8217;s a geeky tech link with details of some of Sony&#8217;s recent sensors for mobiles:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200811/08-144E/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200811/08-144E/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/?p=3185#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>It appears that some of the latest phone cams are using sensors of a similar size to that of the average P&amp;S, so the results from this new Samsung are not at all surprising to me... And my experience is that a DSLR with a wide zoom can be matched (or bettered...) by a decent P&amp;S for low-ISO wide-angle scenic shots.

Personally, this year I&#039;ve decided to ditch the DSLR for travel/social snaps, partly after the annoyance of lugging one around last summer... For me, it&#039;s just not worth the hassle, and I&#039;m happy with the results I&#039;m getting from my P&amp;S cams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that some of the latest phone cams are using sensors of a similar size to that of the average P&amp;S, so the results from this new Samsung are not at all surprising to me&#8230; And my experience is that a DSLR with a wide zoom can be matched (or bettered&#8230;) by a decent P&amp;S for low-ISO wide-angle scenic shots.</p>
<p>Personally, this year I&#8217;ve decided to ditch the DSLR for travel/social snaps, partly after the annoyance of lugging one around last summer&#8230; For me, it&#8217;s just not worth the hassle, and I&#8217;m happy with the results I&#8217;m getting from my P&amp;S cams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roentarre</title>
		<link>http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>roentarre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/?p=3185#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>Wow, Seriously! I think Canon should self destruct itself for producing low level product for the past 2 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Seriously! I think Canon should self destruct itself for producing low level product for the past 2 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/?p=3185#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mis. I for one have been looking for a better camera phone. I was considering the new 3mp I phone that just came out, but I am not impressed by the images that have come out of my daughters (she was one of the million who got one when they came out) phone. I think my blackberry&#039;s 2 mp is better and that is nothing to brag about. I will read the posted article and see. I know that Samsung makes some pretty good stuff, so we will see.
Thanks again and keep writing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mis. I for one have been looking for a better camera phone. I was considering the new 3mp I phone that just came out, but I am not impressed by the images that have come out of my daughters (she was one of the million who got one when they came out) phone. I think my blackberry&#8217;s 2 mp is better and that is nothing to brag about. I will read the posted article and see. I know that Samsung makes some pretty good stuff, so we will see.<br />
Thanks again and keep writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suecae</title>
		<link>http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/new-samsung-m8910-pixon12-cameraphone-is-better-than-canon-350d-digital-rebel-xt/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Suecae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enticingthelight.wordpress.com/?p=3185#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>Indeed it is the consumers who loose. I wish the megapixel race was dead and gone, but it isn&#039;t. And that is the really sad part of this whole thing. 

Makes me wonder, if by the same logic you could claim that this phone in question is twice as good as my 6 megapixel Pentax DSLR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is the consumers who loose. I wish the megapixel race was dead and gone, but it isn&#8217;t. And that is the really sad part of this whole thing. </p>
<p>Makes me wonder, if by the same logic you could claim that this phone in question is twice as good as my 6 megapixel Pentax DSLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
